Files
nova/doc/source/devref
Joe Gordon 57a2dd0bf6 Add policy on how patches and reviews go hand in hand
There is currently a misconception about how a patch gets merged:
Author proposes a patch, review team reviews it. Us, and Them. Instead
it should be a 'We.'
If the review bandwidth doesn't grow at the same rate as the patch
proposal rate then we end up with a massive backlog where people are
pinging cores for reviews.

Record a recommended policy of asking patch authors to offset the review
resources spent on their patch by reviewing other patches.

Change-Id: I50653f8ea58240fa664519f544ce16b2adf39006
2014-08-04 12:04:25 +10:00
..
2012-02-29 09:53:59 -08:00
2014-07-22 12:18:51 +02:00
2012-09-23 14:12:42 +10:00
2014-04-25 21:47:41 -07:00
2014-07-18 14:28:09 -04:00
2014-07-08 11:19:27 -07:00
2011-08-02 10:09:58 -04:00
2011-04-11 21:43:12 +00:00
2014-05-13 22:14:49 -05:00