57a2dd0bf6
There is currently a misconception about how a patch gets merged: Author proposes a patch, review team reviews it. Us, and Them. Instead it should be a 'We.' If the review bandwidth doesn't grow at the same rate as the patch proposal rate then we end up with a massive backlog where people are pinging cores for reviews. Record a recommended policy of asking patch authors to offset the review resources spent on their patch by reviewing other patches. Change-Id: I50653f8ea58240fa664519f544ce16b2adf39006